April 6, 2008

Can Science Seek the Soul?

imageAn intriguing video of scholars discussing the scientific evidence, or lack thereof, of the existence of the soul. Click the photo above to go to the site to view the video.

Participants: Brown, Radin, Searle, Tart, Wolf

Warren Brown is professor of psychology at Fuller Theological Seminary, where he is director of the Psychophysical Laboratory. His book, Whatever Happened to the Soul, which denies an independent, dualistic nature to the soul, is considered a significant contribution to contemporary Christian thought.



Dean Radin is considered one of the world’s leading parapsychology researchers, having done cutting-edge research at various institutions including the Conscious Research Laboratory at the University of Nevada, Princeton, SRI International, the University of Edinburgh, and for the U.S. government. He gives a comprehensive account of contemporary psi research in his best-selling book, The Conscious Universe: The Scientific Truth of Psychic Phenomena.



John Searle, professor of philosophy at the University of California, Berkeley, is considered to be the leading living philosopher of mind. He is the author of numerous works, including The Mystery of Consciousness, The Rediscovery of the Mind, The Construction of Social Reality, and Minds, Brains and Science.



Charles Tart is one of the leading figures in the fields of parapsychology and transpersonal psychology. He is professor at The Institute of Transpersonal Psychology and is the author of numerous articles and books on psychology and parapsychology, including Altered States of Consciousness, which has been called one of the 100 most important books in 20th Century psychology. He has studied various Eastern spiritual disciplines and holds a black belt in Aikido.



Fred Alan Wolf is a theoretical physicist and international lecturer on consciousness and the new physics. He is an award-winning author of eight books, including The Spiritual Universe, The Dreaming Universe, Parallel Universes, and Taking the Quantum Leap.



Robert Lawrence Kuhn is the creator and host of the Closer To Truth television series and author of the Closer To Truth book. Trained in brain research (Ph.D. UCLA), he has published more than twenty books, including the Handbook for Creative and Innovative Managers and the seven-volume Library of Investment Banking. He is the president of The Geneva Companies, a leading merger and acquisition firm for private, middle market businesses

Response:

  • How could your teachers use this video in the classroom?
Click to read full article>>>

Can A Christian School Be Too Religious?

Bumper sticker Christianity By Mark A. Kennedy, Regional Director, Eastern Canada
Association of Christian Schools International

Thirty three years ago I began my teaching career at an old and respected British Empire style boys’ school in Toronto. There I became friends with a science teacher who was considered one of the foremost ornithologists in Canada and Great Britain.

Whenever the CBC (Canadian Broadcasting Corporation) wanted to make a television program about birds they always involved my friend. He was amazingly knowledgeable and loved his area of expertise far more than any other aspect of science. So much so that he would gladly give long bird discourses with the least bit of prompting.

Unfortunately his students figured that out. They discovered that if someone asked a bird related question in science class, no matter how off topic, my friend would perch on the corner of a lab table and begin to soar upward, ever upward on the wings of ostentatious ornithological oratory – his gums wouldn’t stop flapping till the end of class time. To the students that meant no homework, no upcoming Birdytests and no acquired knowledge about the originally intended topic. Before he caught on to the students’ ruse my friend’s inordinate focus on birds became an enemy to a more balanced and thorough teaching of science. Put simply his science classes were too “birdy”.

In the same way a Christian school can be too “religious” when it focuses inappropriately on matters that are ‘religious’ by definition.

According to the Oxford and Webster Dictionaries the adjective ‘religious’ refers to a belief in, or worship of a superhuman controlling power,. It is a system of faith and worship, a manifesting of faith through obedience and devotion.

The Apostle Paul expanded on this when in Acts 12:22 he commended the “religious” character of the Athenians because they actively worshipped a deity – even though they didn’t know who that deity was (the unknown god).

In James 1:26, 27 and 1Timothy 5:4 the authors say that the signs of a truly “religious” character are some specifically moral actions.

So the word “religious’ addresses matters of faith, worship, devotion, obedience and moral behavior. Of course each one of these traits should be a valid component of a Christian school education to be sure but none is the central issue. Above all else Christian schooling in its broadest sense is about truth. There is even a kind of truth trinity that applies to our schools.

First there is Jesus, the living truth, whose daily presence gives our schools and our staff members and students direction and meaning. Through the Holy Spirit he indwells, comforts and leads us in all truth.

Second there is the truth that is the written word of God which provides an accurate knowledge of God and his expectations for us. It also provides a plumb line that helps us discern what is true and what is false.

Third there is the truth that is revealed in the created world: the facts, figures and formulas and all the other practical matters that make up our academic curriculum.

And because we believe that “all truth is God’s truth”, when our students learn principles of physics, or solutions for mathematical problems or skills of written or oral communications they are learning God’s truth - even if their teachers aren’t able to present scripture verses to go along with each truth. Further, because we are operating schools, we had better excel at presenting God’s truth especially in the academic realm so, as ACSI’s mission statement says we can “effectively prepare students for life.” That does not lessen our responsibility to integrate scriptural principles into the academic program. But we will have failed in our overall mission if our graduates have learned scriptural principles in Math or Language or Science but never quite grasped the core knowledge and skills they need for practical applications in their adult lives. And we will have failed to teach them the whole truth too.

A Christian school is becoming too religious when:

1. Religious matters hijack the teaching of God’s other truths. For example, a weekly chapel service is routinely allowed to run overtime and consumes significant portions of the time allocated to the following academic classes.

2. Factual information is ignored because it conflicts with particular religious convictions or with a popular interpretation of scripture. As a case in point, the 16th century church rejected Galileo’s observation that the earth revolves around the sun because it conflicted with their understanding of Psalm 113:3:

From the rising of the sun to the place where it sets, the name of the Lord is to be praised.”

3. Only Christian authors are studied in literature class, only Christians are portrayed positively in history lessons, only Christian compositions and composers are allowed in the music program thereby encouraging an arrogant and false sense of superiority among Christian students and ignoring the need to develop discernment skills.

4. Intellectual dishonesty is a tool to support religious convictions. Facts are altered or omitted to make certain individuals or religious groups “look good”.

5. Religion is used to promote any attitudes or actions that are contrary to Jesus’ teachings and example (i.e. acts of terrorism, promotion of hatred towards individuals or groups).

6. Students are expected to memorize, believe and regurgitate whatever they are told and are discouraged from thinking critically and Christianly.

7. Issues of great concern for humanity such as HIV/AIDS, natural disasters, starvation, poverty, environmental degradation, pollution, social injustice are denigrated or ignored because these things aren’t specifically religious.

8. Teachers are hired and retained because of their spirituality with little regard for their teaching abilities and training or their willingness to upgrade their subject knowledge and teaching skills.

9. School leadership has little or no concern about honestly evaluating and improving the academic program because the overwhelming goal of the school is to produce strong (meaning demonstrably ‘religious’) Christians.

It seems pretty clear that just as my friend’s bird obsession weakened his science program, a preoccupation with “religious” things damages the overall effectiveness of a Christian school.

That is because Christianity in general and Christian schooling in particular should be concerned with the entirety of God’s truth not just one part of it.

So a Christian school can indeed be too religious but thankfully it cannot be too Christian.

Response (Barrett Mosbacker)

To reinforce Mr. Kennedy's point, I recently stumbled onto an essay titled It's Happened to a Lot of Good Christians by Dr. Teresa Whitehurst, a clinical psychologist and writer. Dr. Whitehurst purports to be responding to a conversation she overheard at a local coffee shop between two Christian college students. Although Dr. Whitehurst's unfounded assumptions and poor logic betray her own astounding ignorance and arrogance, her concern over anti-intellectualism within Christianity has merit.

The conversation described by Dr. Whitehurst exhibits a well meaning but misguided religiosity that does not take seriously the life of the Christian mind thus failing to obey the command to "Love God with all of our minds...."

1. Have you encountered anti-intellectual tendencies in your school? Do those tendencies originate with faculty, students, or parents?

2. Does anti-intellectualism force us to be "politically correct" in our schools? In other words, do we avoid or misinterpret facts to avoid controversy? If so, what is the consequence for our students? What is the consequence for the Gospel?

3. What is the best response to anti-intellectualism in our schools? Have you dealt with this issue and if so, how?

Click to read full article>>>

How To Create a Technology Plan--Technology Integration Article IV

Over the last several months I have posted four articles on technology integration (listed below for your convenience), along with a number of smaller articles providing information on technology resources such as the worldwide telescope (see video below) and leveraging technology to increase our productivity (For example Don't Forget to Jott--Why? and Is This the Ultimate Binder or Notebook?).

How do we get from where we are to where we need to be? Technology is expensive, most teachers are not well trained, time is limited, funds are limited, and IT support is limited. How do we plan for, fund, and effectively implement technology in our schools?

Technology Planning

Over the years I have noticed that technology planning efforts have wide pendulum swings from overly complex (5" inch binders filled with minute detail that no one reads) to the impulsive and simplistic resulting in the wasting of large sums of money and time and leading to frustrated teachers.

Here is a basic outline to guide your thinking about technology planning:

1. Curriculum:

ImageStart with the instructional end in mind. Do not start planning with questions regarding hardware and software. Key questions to answer:

  1. What are the core academic objectives for core subjects (not including technology and computer sciences) for the use of technology?
  2. What are we striving to achieve through technology that cannot be achieved or achieved as effectively and efficiently using traditional methods? Technology integration is not the objective, it is potentially the means to an academic objective.
  3. What is the relationship between core academic standards and technology standards?

The International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE) has established the following 2007 standards for students. Click here for the PDF version of the standards.

1. Creativity and Innovation

Students demonstrate creative thinking, construct knowledge, and develop innovative products and processes using technology. Students:

a. apply existing knowledge to generate new ideas, products, or processes.

b. create original works as a means of personal or group expression.

c. use models and simulations to explore complex systems and issues.

d. identify trends and forecast possibilities.

2. Communication and Collaboration

Students use digital media and environments to communicate and work collaboratively, including at a distance, to support individual learning and contribute to the learning of others. Students:

a. interact, collaborate, and publish with peers, experts, or others employing a variety of digital environments and media.

b. communicate information and ideas effectively to multiple audiences using a variety of media and formats.

c. develop cultural understanding and global awareness by engaging with learners of other cultures.

d. contribute to project teams to produce original works or solve problems.

3. Research and Information Fluency

Students apply digital tools to gather, evaluate, and use information. Students:

a. plan strategies to guide inquiry.

b. locate, organize, analyze, evaluate, synthesize, and ethically use information from a variety of sources and media.

c. evaluate and select information sources and digital tools based on the appropriateness to specific tasks.

d. process data and report results.

4. Critical Thinking, Problem Solving, and Decision Making

Students use critical thinking skills to plan and conduct research, manage projects, solve problems, and make informed decisions using appropriate digital tools and resources. Students:

a. identify and define authentic problems and significant questions for investigation.

b. plan and manage activities to develop a solution or complete a project.

c. collect and analyze data to identify solutions and/or make informed decisions.

d. use multiple processes and diverse perspectives to explore alternative solutions.

5. Digital Citizenship

Students understand human, cultural, and societal issues related to technology and practice legal and ethical behavior. Students:

a. advocate and practice safe, legal, and responsible use of information and technology.

b. exhibit a positive attitude toward using technology that supports collaboration, learning, and productivity.

c. demonstrate personal responsibility for lifelong learning.

d. exhibit leadership for digital citizenship.

6. Technology Operations and Concepts

Students demonstrate a sound understanding of technology concepts, systems, and operations. Students:

a. understand and use technology systems.

b. select and use applications effectively and productively.

c. troubleshoot systems and applications.

d. transfer current knowledge to learning of new technologies.

2. Administrative Use of Technology:

Practice what we preach! We cannot expect teachers to expend the time and energy to integrate technology into their classrooms if we do not do likewise in our offices. Doing so will imagerequire EXTRA time and EXTRA effort on our part to find, experiment with, learn, and incorporate technology that goes beyond the Internet browser, email, and word processing into our daily routines.

The Center on Technology and Learning (CTL)recommends planning to use technology to reduce time spent on administrative tasks and allow more time for instruction. This component should also address the administrative uses of technology. Using technology to complete record keeping and collaborative tasks more efficiently allows more time to be spent on instruction that improves student achievement.

(Search this site using the search box on the top right for "technology" or "productivity" to find related posts and resources.)

ISTE provides the following administrative standards (NOTE: these are 2002 standards. Administrator Standards 2009 are due for release at NECC 2008 in San Antonio. Revised Teacher Standards will also be released at NECC 2008).

Leadership and Vision

Educational leaders inspire a shared vision for comprehensive integration of technology and foster an environment and culture conducive to the realization of that vision. Educational leaders:

A. facilitate the shared development by all stakeholders of a vision for technology use and widely communicate that vision.

B. maintain an inclusive and cohesive process to develop, implement, and monitor a dynamic, long-range, and systemic technology plan to achieve the vision.

C. foster and nurture a culture of responsible risk-taking and advocate policies promoting continuous innovation with technology.

D. use data in making leadership decisions.

E. advocate for research-based effective practices in use of technology.

F. Advocate on the state and national levels for policies, programs, and funding opportunities that support implementation of the technology plan.

Learning and Teaching

Educational leaders ensure that curricular design, instructional strategies, and learning environments integrate appropriate technologies to maximize learning and teaching. Educational leaders:

A. identify, use, evaluate, and promote appropriate technologies to enhance and support instruction and standards-based curriculum leading to high levels of student achievement.

B. facilitate and support collaborative technology-enriched learning environments conducive to innovation for improved learning.

C. provide for learner-centered environments that use technology to meet the individual and diverse needs of learners.

D. facilitate the use of technologies to support and enhance instructional methods that develop higher-level thinking, decision-making, and problem-solving skills.

E. provide for and ensure that faculty and staff take advantage of high-quality professional learning opportunities for improved learning and teaching with technology.

Productivity and Professional Practice

image Educational leaders apply technology to enhance their professional practice and to increase their own productivity and that of others. Educational leaders:

A. model the routine, intentional, and effective use of technology.

B. employ technology for communication and collaboration among colleagues, staff, parents, students, and the larger community.

C. create and participate in learning communities that stimulate, nurture, and support faculty and staff in using technology for improved productivity.

D. engage in sustained, job-related professional learning using technology resources.

E. maintain awareness of emerging technologies and their potential uses in education.

F. use technology to advance organizational improvement.

Support, Management, and Operations

Educational leaders ensure the integration of technology to support productive systems for learning and administration. Educational leaders:

A. develop, implement, and monitor policies and guidelines to ensure compatibility of technologies.

B. implement and use integrated technology-based management and operations systems.

C. allocate financial and human resources to ensure complete and sustained implementation of the technology plan.

D. integrate strategic plans, technology plans, and other improvement plans and policies to align efforts and leverage resources.

E. implement procedures to drive continuous improvement of technology systems and to support technology replacement cycles.

Assessment and Evaluation

Educational leaders use technology to plan and implement comprehensive systems of effective assessment and evaluation. Educational leaders:

A. use multiple methods to assess and evaluate appropriate uses of technology resources for learning, communication, and productivity.

B. use technology to collect and analyze data, interpret results, and communicate findings to improve instructional practice and student learning.

C. assess staff knowledge, skills, and performance in using technology and use results to facilitate high-quality professional development and to inform personnel decisions.

D. use technology to assess, evaluate, and manage administrative and operational systems.

Social, Legal, and Ethical Issues

Educational leaders understand the social, legal, and ethical issues related to technology and model responsible decision making related to these issues. Educational leaders:

A. ensure equity of access to technology resources that enable and empower all learners and educators.

B. identify, communicate, model, and enforce social, legal, and ethical practices to promote responsible use of technology.

C. promote and enforce privacy, security, and online safety related to the use of technology.

D. promote and enforce environmentally safe and healthy practices in the use of technology.

E. participate in the development of policies that clearly enforce copyright law and assign ownership of intellectual property developed with school resources.

Professional Development

Staff Training This is the most critical component of technology planning. Yet, it is where most of our schools fall woefully short.

Before moving into more detail, you may find 21st Century Connections to be a very helpful resources. Click here to access the Staff Development section of their web site.

Money

We invest ten of thousands of dollars in hardware and software but only a few thousand (if that) on staff development. Yet, according to the CTL, businesses consider training a part of the total cost of ownership (TCO); without the training, the equipment is as useless as it would be without electricity. A rule of thumb in the business community is that the amount of resources committed to staff development should be approximately the same as the amount of resources committed to the acquisition of new equipment.

Click here for a PDF article on the Total Cost of Ownership. The Consortium for School Networking (CoSN) has some excellent online tools for determining TCO.

Time and Location

Technology training is best integrated into subject matter programs and embedded in the classroom or educational setting. Your technology plan needs to address how professional development will be delivered and allocate time for this important activity

Time limitations for faculty development is a challenge. Accordingly, the CTL recommends incorporating technology into existing content-specific professional development.

Teachers learn best by studying, doing, and reflecting; by collaborating with other teachers; by looking closely at student learning and evidence of achievement; and by sharing what they see. Therefore, staff development is best facilitated by being embedded in the classroom.

There must also be a consistent ongoing training and support plan if teachers are to become proficient and effective. If adequate follow-up training and support is not provided teachers will grow frustrated and will revert back to the "tried and true (traditional) teaching methods. Frankly, without the necessary support and training they have no choice.

I have found that scheduling staff development days throughout the year that focuses on reinforcing in-service training to be an effective means to provide support and ongoing training. The aphorism, "What you don't use you lose" certainly applies to professional development follow through.

Hardware, Software, and Infrastructure

Circuit boardAFTER addressing instructional objectives and staff development, it is time to address the "technology stuff." The CTL recommends the following approach:

1. Generate a list of the technology the school's needs in order to support the Curriculum and Professional Development components.

Once the vision, goals, and strategies have been established for using technology to help students meet content standards, the next job is to identify the technology and physical plant modifications needed to accomplish the Curriculum and Professional Development components.

This component involves assessing the current status of the infrastructure, hardware, software (including online learning resources), and technical support in the school and planning how those resources can be recycled or supplemented to create the learning environment envisioned in the Curriculum component.

2. Make the technology available and accessible.
The planning team must not only determine how the school will use technology but also decide where technology will be used. Research on academic gains attributable to technology
points to easy access for students and teachers in the classroom as the place in which the greatest impact may be achieved.

3. Consider security measures for protecting both the equipment and the data. Schools have many responsibilities when building a technology infrastructure, including devising acceptable-use
policies and security procedures. Although most schools report positive experiences with technology, it is still important for schools to have rules specifying the consequences of misuses.

Deciding how a school will respond to technology infractions, such as altered or deleted files, disabled or missing workstations, misconfigured networks, and misuses of the internet, is important to determine in advance.

There are two types of security issues in a technology infrastructure: physical security and electronic security. Physical security measures include installing and/or upgrading the locking systems throughout the school, installing electronic monitoring devices where technology is stored, and electronically tagging all equipment for easy identification if stolen.

4. Consider long-term implications.
Technology planning needs to be comprehensive and include consideration of the long-term implications of the choices made. Consider the following points:

• Hardware purchased should be powerful enough to meet future needs, including the need for data, voice, and video capabilities.

• Hardware purchased should meet school needs and have the lowest cost of ownership over the long term. This may lead to networked thin clients and/or networked computers.

Resources You Can Use

In addition to the links provided above, I have compiled a few links below that I believe you will find useful for planning, technology integration, and your personal productivity:




Student Response System


New Super Binocular Telescope (images sharper than the Hubble)

Response:

  • What is the state of technology planning in your school?
  • What is the biggest challenge to creating an effective technology plan?
  • What technology integration question or issue would you like to have addressed in this blog?
Click to read full article>>>

EXPELLED: No Intelligence Allowed


From the web site:

WHO

Ben Stein, in the new film EXPELLED: No Intelligence Allowed

WHAT

His heroic and, at times, shocking journey confronting the world’s top scientists, educators and philosophers, regarding the persecution of the many by an elite few.

WHEN

Coming to a theater near you on April 18, 2008

WHERE

Ben travels the world on his quest, and learns an awe-inspiring truth…that bewilders him, then angers him…and then spurs him to action!

WHY

Ben realizes that he has been “Expelled,” and that educators and scientists are being ridiculed, denied tenure and even fired – for the “crime” of merely believing that there might be evidence of “design” in nature, and that perhaps life is not just the result of accidental, random chance.

To which Ben Says: "Enough!" And then gets busy. NOBODY messes with Ben.

Click to read full article>>>

It's Here: The WorldWide Telescope Site is Up! More Spring 2008

image

This tool promises to be a tremendous and awe inspiring resource. Check out the site below to see children react and for more news on the launch of the WorldWide Telescope.

Click to read full article>>>

10 Commandments of Cell Phone Etiquette

From InfoWorld:

1. Thou shalt not subject defenseless others to cell phone conversations. When people cannot escape the banality of your conversation, such as on the bus, in a cab, on a grounded airplane, or at the dinner table, you should spare them. People around you should have the option of not listening. If they don't, you shouldn't be babbling.

2. Thou shalt not set thy ringer to play La Cucaracha every time thy phone rings. Or Beethoven's Fifth, or the Bee Gees, or any other annoying melody. Is it not enough that phones go off every other second? Now we have to listen to synthesized nonsense?

3. Thou shalt turn thy cell phone off during public performances. I'm not even sure this one needs to be said, but given the repeated violations of this heretofore unwritten law, I felt compelled to include it.

4. Thou shalt not wear more than two wireless devices on thy belt. This hasn't become a big problem yet. But with plenty of techno-jockeys sporting pagers and phones, Batman-esque utility belts are sure to follow. Let's nip this one in the bud.image

5. Thou shalt not dial while driving. In all seriousness, this madness has to stop. There are enough people in the world who have problems mastering vehicles and phones individually. Put them together and we have a serious health hazard on our hands.

6. Thou shalt not wear thy earpiece when thou art not on thy phone. This is not unlike being on the phone and carrying on another conversation with someone who is physically in your presence. No one knows if you are here or there. Very disturbing.

7. Thou shalt not speak louder on thy cell phone than thou would on any other phone. These things have incredibly sensitive microphones, and it's gotten to the point where I can tell if someone is calling me from a cell because of the way they are talking, not how it sounds. If your signal cuts out, speaking louder won't help, unless the person is actually within earshot.

8. Thou shalt not grow too attached to thy cell phone. For obvious reasons, a dependency on constant communication is not healthy. At work, go nuts. At home, give it a rest.

9. Thou shalt not attempt to impress with thy cell phone. Not only is using a cell phone no longer impressive in any way (unless it's one of those really cool new phones with the space age design), when it is used for that reason, said user can be immediately identified as a neophyte and a poseur.

10. Thou shalt not slam thy cell phone down on a restaurant table just in case it rings. This is not the Old West, and you are not a gunslinger sitting down to a game of poker in the saloon. Could you please be a little less conspicuous? If it rings, you'll hear it just as well if it's in your coat pocket or clipped on your belt.

Technorati Tags: ,,,
Click to read full article>>>

April 5, 2008

Nicest Prayer

The following prayer was forwarded to me and I thought I would share it with my readers.

Heavenly Father, Help us remember that the jerk who cut us off in traffic last night is a single mother who worked nine hours that day and is rushing home to cook dinner, help with homework, do the laundry and spend a few precious moments with her children.

Help us to remember that the pierced, tattooed, disinterested young man who can't make change correctly is a worried 19-year-old college student, balancing his apprehension over final exams with his fear of not getting his student loans for next semester.

Remind us, Lord, that the scary looking bum, begging for money in the same spot every day (who really ought to get a job!) is a slave to addictions that we can only imagine in our worst nightmares.

Help us to remember that the old couple walking annoyingly slow through the store aisles and blocking our shopping progress are savoring this moment, knowing that, based on the biopsy report she got back last week, this will be the last year that they go shopping together.

Heavenly Father, remind us each day that, of all the gifts you give us, the greatest gift is love. It is not enough to share that love with those we hold dear. Open our hearts not to just those who are close to us, but to all humanity.

Let us be slow to judge and quick to forgive, show patience, empathy and love.

Technorati Tags: ,
Click to read full article>>>

Stressed Out Students

By Mitchell Salerno, Secondary Principal, Statesville Christian School

Are you stressed? Overworked? Tired? The evidence suggests that our students are. Many American high school students are reportedly overworked and pressured to produce wonderful grades, compete in athletics, and participate in clubs. What is the pot at the end of the rainbow? Getting into a great college!

However, getting into America's best colleges is certainly becoming more competitive. Consider the following article from the New York Times (click here for the article). Acceptance rates are very low. I recently learned of a school that received over 35,000 applications and accepted 7,500 students with the intention of welcoming 2,500 freshmen on campus in the fall. This pressure has produced high school environments that are competitive and cut-throat.

There are several organizations that are concerned about the stress that high school students are facing. One of them is at Stanford University, called Stressed Out Students or SOS for short (click here to visit the SOS website). This organization works with high schools to reduce the amount of stress placed on students. The following article from the Washington Post (click here for the article) and video from CNN (click here for the video) highlight the program at Stanford and provide information regarding the amount of stress that schools, parents, and others place on our young people.

The SCS faculty recently read an article by Pope (the founder and director of the SOS program) and analyzed it from a biblical worldview. In particular, we were interested in why so many of our students were seeking admission into a "great" college. In this sense, our students are no different than the average American high school student.

Recently, I was the substitute in one of our senior courses and I asked eight seniors if they felt stress. For the most part, they answered that they did. Furthermore, I asked them if grades were important and they suggested that they were. When I asked them what good grades would deliver they suggested that good grades led to a good college which led to a good job which led to money which led to happiness and being comfortable. I finally asked them what their ideal life would look like and they replied that they would have a great family, earn enough money to provide for their needs, and live in a safe neighborhood.

Before you get too excited, I would suggest that you examine your own heart. Personally, I must admit that I have had the same thoughts. Yet, is this God's ideal? Does he call us to comfort or to service?

The SCS faculty has been wrestling with our role in inculcating a biblical worldview in our students such that they seek to develop their talents for God's glory and His service. The SOS program at Stanford seeks to reduce stress by altering schedules, teaching Yoga, reducing homework, etc.; however, these are merely temporary and fleeting attempts to mediate the humanistic and materialistic foundations that undergird the real issue. As Christians, we understand that reducing stress lies not in techniques but in the One that produces peace (Read Romans 8, considering it light of the current discussion).

I have challenged the faculty to consider how we can better instill a biblical worldview in our students and how we can create an environment that is developmentally appropriate. Interestingly, I have noticed that the gospel is not congruent with popular culture. At some point we will need to address what a Christian values compared to what the world values. I would contend that the "great" college is not the most prestigious, but the one that God has providentially chosen.

I invite parents, students, and faculty to chime in on the discussion. These types of worldview discussions are uncomfortable because they challenge the world within us. I am truly interested in your thoughts.

Click to read full article>>>